Whip It Good

Your Ad Here

Dispatches from the Capitol via our reporters and others' indicate a steady stream of Republican Members of Congress who are already announced "No" votes on the Boehner plan are being summoned to the Speaker's office.

On his way in to the Speaker's office, Rep. Louis Gohmert -- a strong "No" vote -- said he had been called to the principal's office. On the way out, he said Gohmert said he was still a "bloody, beaten down no."

And so it goes as the House leadership tries to wrangle enough votes.

It's reminiscent of the Part D Medicare prescription drug vote back during the Bush days, when the House vote was kept open for hours while leadership cajoled, threatened and bartered to get it passed. But this time they've held off on starting the vote until they know they have enough Member on board to pass it.

The way this is playing out, it's not an overstatement to say Boehner's speakership is on the line here.



Jon Stewart destroys O’Reilly’s arguments that Anders Breivik wasn’t Christian, and sets up a GOP Special Vicitms Unit to boot

Your Ad Here


In the first video, Jon Stewart destroys Bill O'Reillys lame arguments that Anders Breivik wasn't a Christian, even though he printed a 1,500-page Christian manifesto, but the Ft Hood killer was a Muslim because he printed up cards.

In the second video, Stewart captures how many times FOX News guests attack liberals with vicious rhetoric and false smears while claiming they are the ones being victimized.

Raw Story:

Comedy Central’s Jon Stewart noted Wednesday that Fox News conservatives have been quick to use the killings in Norway to play the victim card while attacking liberals for doing the exact same thing.

“I actually feel sorry for the pundits and anchors who have added this story to their file of grievances that are perpetrated against them,” Stewart said. “Not because they are actually victims of persecutions, but because I know the sense of grievance and victimization that appears to pervade their every waking moment is actually something they hate in others.”

What followed might be The Daily Show‘s most impressive takedown of Fox News ever.

Hey, Liberals are only called traitors, anti-American, baby killers. pro-Jihadist and corrupters of our youth almost every day by conservatives, but that's not mean, is it? The Hannity clip near the end explains it all.

Plus, it also contains the already-immortal description of Sean Hannity's doublespeak:

STEWART: That is, if I may say, some of the most free-range, organically grown, disingenuous, ideologically marinated un-self-awareness I've ever seen in the wild.


Boehner Has a Sad

Your Ad Here
boehnerCantor_talkradionews-Flickr

who's the boss? (photo: talkradionews)

It wouldn’t be John Boehner without some tears being shed, and that’s what happened yesterday.

At a meeting of the House Republican freshmen and their leaders on Wednesday, there wasn’t a dry eye in the room — including the speaker’s.

Representative Martha Roby of Alabama had just finished reading an e-mail of support from her one-time Tea Party opponent, recognizing the tough choices that the new Republicans faced in the vote to raise the debt ceiling.

Mr. Boehner, who has become somewhat famous for his occasional display of emotion, joined others in the room by crying a bit during the closed-door session.

“He wasn’t sobbing, but he definitely teared up,” said Michael Steel, the speaker’s spokesman.

What will really make Boehner cry is if he can’t get the votes today. But all of these vote-counters seem to forget that a Speaker of the House has power, and his rank and file knows it.

U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan’s open defiance of Speaker John Boehner’s efforts to solve the debt-ceiling crisis could cost the Urbana Republican his safe seat in next year’s election.

Two Republican sources deeply involved in configuring new Ohio congressional districts confirmed to The Dispatch today that Jordan’s disloyalty to Boehner has put him in jeopardy of being zeroed out of a district.

[cont'd.]

“Jim Jordan’s boneheadedness has kind of informed everybody’s thinking,” said one of the sources, both of whom spoke only on condition of anonymity. “The easiest option for everybody has presented itself.”

Jordan’s rural 11-county district, which has a 60 percent Republican voter index, “is easy to cannibalize because it stretches so far,” said the other source.

Everyone in that Republican caucus knows what can happen to them if they don’t show loyalty to the Speaker today. Some of them fear the Tea Party more, but not all. The vote will be close, because it has to be close; Boehner will allow as many conservatives to walk on the vote as possible. In the end, I say it gets done.

The vote is tentatively scheduled for 6pm ET.

…OK, maybe I spoke too soon. The House just “postponed” the vote. More in a minute…

I was willing to give Boehner the benefit of the doubt all day, but wow, postponing the vote. He has no power whatsoever. What a rudderless ship.

…Eric Cantor’s office is now saying that the vote will happen tonight.

…Incidentally, the best vote tally I’ve seen is from Judd Legum, who says that 26 Republicans are on the record against the Boehner plan. Without Dem support, that would be enough to defeat it.

Late afternoon/early evening open thread

Your Ad Here

Speaking out for good jobs in Pittsburgh:


Presented By:

Your Ad Here

Boehner postpones debt ceiling vote until later this evening

Your Ad Here
Via Think Progress, an alert sent to Members of Congress a short time ago (my emphasis):
**Members are advised that the House GOP Leadership has postponed the votes on the motion to recommit and final passage of S. 627 – Speaker Boehner’s Short Term Default Act (amending the Faster FOIA Act of 2011). Following general debate on S. 627, the House will consider the eight bills listed for consideration under suspension of the Rules.

Republicans say the vote will still be held tonight, despite the postponement. Presumably, Boehner still doesn't think he has enough votes lined up to pass his bill, something Think Progress has been reporting all day long. According to their latest tally, 26 House Republicans have said they will oppose his bill, enough to kill it.

2:51 PM PT: From a CBS News producer:

Rep. Gohmert, a no, just walked into Boehner's office. Said he was called to the principal's office.

3:01 PM PT: Reid's office:

Reid's spox > RT @AJentleson: The Senate stands ready to defeat the Boehner plan whenever House Republicans can get their act together.

3:04 PM PT: CNN steps out on a limb: "It appears" Boehner doesn't have the votes. Says it's not clear when the vote will take place.

3:05 PM PT: You know how Boehner says his plan is bipartisan? Well, as they used to say about health care reform, the only thing that seems bipartisan about this plan is the opposition to it.

3:08 PM PT: Jamie Dupree tweets Rep. Bill Posey said Boehner is leaning on him, but that Posey is not decided oven way or another. That's interesting because Posey isn't on Think Progress's no list.


GOP leaders beg right-wing media for some help. Right-wing media dutifully complies

Your Ad Here
Speaker Boehner wants some RW media love
(Larry Downing/Reuters)
Earlier in the week, when Speaker John Boehner's debt "plan" was circling the drain, even among members of his own caucus, a major effort was undertaken to put a fresh coat of lipstick on the pig.

A key cog of that reclamation strategy was to turn key components of the conservative media into advocates for the plan (emphasis mine):

With little or no Democratic support for the GOP plan, Boehner and his top lieutenants had to battle their own party on two fronts.

First, Boehner was hauling members who are undecided or leaning “no” into his Capitol suite for one-on-one meetings, using the time-honored tradition of his office to twist arms and win votes. Boehner had “made progress,” but the CBO scores threw all that progress into doubt.

And outside the Capitol, the top Republican leaders engaged in a PR campaign to win over conservative interest groups and opinion-makers.

The Republican leadership has privately reached out to conservative TV personalities like Sean Hannity and Brit Hume, and Wall Street Journal editorial page editor Paul Gigot, National Review’s Kate O’Beirne, Stephen Hayes of The Weekly Standard, David Brooks of The New York Times, George Will, Laura Ingraham, Mark Levin, and groups such as The Heritage Foundation, among others, have all heard from Republican leadership, including Chief Deputy Whip Peter Roskam of Illinois.

Whether or not the arm-twisting of House colleagues by the leadership will bear fruit is still a bit of a wild card, given we are still waiting for a vote.

However, there can be little doubt that the effort to massage the right-wing press yielded a bountiful harvest.

Consider this hedging endorsement on Wednesday, courtesy of the Wall Street Journal:

Strangely, some Republicans and conservative activists are condemning this as a fiscal sellout. Senator Jim DeMint put out a statement raking the Speaker for seeking "a better political debt deal, instead of a debt solution" (emphasis, needless to say, his). The usually sensible Club for Growth and Heritage Action, the political arm of the Heritage Foundation, are scoring a vote for the Boehner plan as negative on similar grounds.

If the Boehner plan fails in the House, the advantage shifts to Harry Reid's Senate plan.
.But what none of these critics have is an alternative strategy for achieving anything nearly as fiscally or politically beneficial as Mr. Boehner's plan. The idea seems to be that if the House GOP refuses to raise the debt ceiling, a default crisis or gradual government shutdown will ensue, and the public will turn en masse against . . . Barack Obama. The Republican House that failed to raise the debt ceiling would somehow escape all blame. Then Democrats would have no choice but to pass a balanced-budget amendment and reform entitlements, and the tea-party Hobbits could return to Middle Earth having defeated Mordor.

This is the kind of crack political thinking that turned Sharron Angle and Christine O'Donnell into GOP Senate nominees. The reality is that the debt limit will be raised one way or another, and the only issue now is with how much fiscal reform and what political fallout.

(Yes, they did say the "usually sensible Club for Growth.")

Bill Kristol, true to form, also got on board. And he made the WSJ look calm and temperate by comparison. Check out this hyperventilation, in the form of editorial prose:

To govern is to choose. To vote is to choose. To vote against John Boehner on the House floor this week in the biggest showdown of the current Congress is to choose to vote with Nancy Pelosi. To vote against Boehner is to choose to support Barack Obama. It is to choose to increase the chances that worse legislation than Boehner’s passes. And it is to choose to increase the chances that Obama emerges from this showdown politically stronger. So when the Heritage Action Fund and the Club for Growth, and Senators Vitter, Paul, et al., choose to urge House Republicans to join the Democrats to defeat Boehner, they’re choosing to side with Barack Obama.

Of course, not every conservative voice, or media outlet, has put their imprimatur on the Boehner plan (though the Speaker himself is practically sleeping in Rush Limbaugh's radio studio trying to make it so).

Take, as an example, a particularly noxious little guardian of the right (who moonlights as an analyst for an allegedly serious media outlet), who put his sense of self-importance on display earlier in the week when he bellowed that he was refusing absolution to the teeming masses of Republican officeholders who had called him. Apparently, those GOP solons were begging for forgiveness for even thinking about straying from the path of right-wing righteousness.

Of course, there's always the chance that for those politicos (Boehner included), when it comes to that particular critic, the price simply wasn't right.


This Is Huge

Your Ad Here

The House vote on Speaker Boehner's plan scheduled for tonight has been postponed indefinitely. Read: He didn't have the votes to pass it.

Late word from Cantor's office is that they will still try for a vote this evening, possibly around 7 p.m. ET. But clearly they're buying more time to whip up a few more votes to make sure they can pass it.



Don’t Count On It … Yet

Your Ad Here

Peering into the fog of the run-up to this House vote this evening, it's actually not clear Speaker Boehner has the votes to get his debt plan through the chamber. The operating assumption most of today has been that he'll find the votes one way or the other. And that may still bear out. But it's not a certainty.



Keith Ellison Responds to King’s Refusal to Allow Him to Testify in His Upcoming Muslim Witch Hunt

Your Ad Here
Keith Ellison Responds to King's Refusal to Allow Him to Testify in His Upcoming Muslim Witch Hunt

Click here to view this media

Rep. Keith Ellison talked to Keith Olbermann about Rep. Peter King refusing to allow him to testify during his upcoming Homeland Security hearing, which is shaping up just to be another witch hunt, scapegoating Muslim Americans. After Ellison's emotional testimony during the last one, it's not all that surprising.

As Dave noted in his post on the media's terrible coverage of the terrorism in Norway:

It might actually be a good idea if Peter King wants to hold hearings on domestic terrorism. But it needs to tackle the whole threat, and not just the one our xenophobic myopia readily identifies.

The Minnesota Star Tribune gave their take on the upcoming hearings and King's refusal to allow Ellision to testify here -- Short take: Peter King vs. Keith Ellison:

U.S. Rep. Peter King takes his last name a little too seriously.

The New York Republican is chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security, and he’s very concerned about Islamic radicalization. So concerned, in fact, that he held yet another hearing on the topic Wednesday as a sequel to a similar session in March.

There’s no doubt the subject is worthy of thoughtful, objective congressional scrutiny. Those who too quickly write off the inquiry should take time to study the homegrown radicalization of Twin Cities men with connections to Al-Shabab, the terrorist group with links to Al-Qaida.

Earlier this month, a sixth person pleaded guilty in what officials have called “Operation Rhino,’’ the counterterrorism investigation into how local Somalis were recruited to their homeland to fight for Al-Shabab. Since the probe started, at least nine Minnesota men are believed to have been killed while fighting in Somalia.

It’s understandable that King’s Homeland Security committee would pay attention. Federal law enforcement officials have had the Twin Cities on the radar for years, and King invited William Anders Folk, a former prosecutor in the Twin Cities, and St. Paul Police Chief Tom Smith to testify.

Where King failed the credibility test — in addition to his record of anti-Muslim rhetoric —was in his refusal to hear from those who might disagree with him.

In orchestrating Wednesday’s lineup,King stiffed Rep. Keith Ellison, the Minnesota Democrat who pointed out in a letter that his Fifth District has the largest Somali community in the country. King responded that the meeting is an extension of the March hearing, at which Ellison did testify.

The Minnesota congressman deserved a seat at the table because of his work with local and federal law enforcement. The fact that he’s Muslim only adds value to his views.

Nevertheless, in a clear congressional kiss-off, King denied Ellison’s request and asked him to submit easily ignored written testimony.

Given the level of partisan dysfunction in Washington, King’s treatment of Ellison is no surprise. In return, the New Yorker should expect his motives to be called into question.

That's putting it mildly. Keith Olbermann was a bit less charitable to say the least, calling King an "asshole" after his interview with Ellision. I don't disagree, but also don't think it's terribly productive. I think he could have stuck to just calling out his fearmongering and bigotry without making it personal.


Gang of Six Poised to Screw Up Negotiations Again

Your Ad Here
Gang of Six - Cartoon

Gang of Six - Cartoon by DonkeyHotey

I think people are getting a little theatrical about this Boehner showdown, with their focused whip counts and the like. The Washington Post says Boehner is still looking for votes, but I’m really not sweating this. It turns out that Boehner actually needs 216 votes, not 217, because Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) is out of the office today, recovering from colon cancer surgery, along with Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ). The rule for debate passed pretty easily, with 238 votes in favor. Could Boehner lose 22 votes on the final passage? I suppose he could, but I’m not really seeing it.

 

The road from there is a bit uncertain, but you can see the contours. After Boehner’s bill barely passes, it gets killed by the Senate, and some compromise between the two very similar bills is reached. But of course, this is Washington, so some opportunist is looking to throw a wrench into this delicate dance. Enter Kent Conrad:

Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) said Thursday that he expects both the Republicans and Democrats’ current deficit proposals to fail.

When they do, he said, the Gang of Six — a bipartisan group of senators who have negotiated their own deficit deal — would be ready with a draft of their its proposal [...]

“Reality is that both sides have to see that their favorite position cannot prevail,” Conrad said. “It’s at that point you can reach a principled compromise. We’re not quite there yet, but we’re very close.”

The Gang of Six is “going to be prepared to be a part of the solution” once the deadlock happens, Conrad said. The group of senators has a draft that is undergoing revision by “the staffs of all the members,” he said.

You have to question Conrad’s sanity at this point. CBO couldn’t commit to scoring the Gang of Six proposal, really just a five-page outline, two weeks out. Now with just days left before the debt limit is reached, he wants to pull this back out?

The compromise position is already at hand; the Reid and Boehner plans have very few differences (though this is one that I hope gets ironed out). And anyway, Conrad would almost certainly be the co-chair of the “Super Congress” (if they just take the heads of the two budget committees, you’d have Conrad-Ryan), and he can trot out his Gang of Six plan at that point. But forcing it into the endgame of a debate where so much can go wrong seems just completely stupid to me.

As I said the other day, blame the Gang of Six.

House Republicans are not just do-nothings — they’re spinning their wheels furiously

Your Ad Here

Tina Dupuy has an excellent piece in The Atlantic examining how this Republican Congress is on pace to set a modern record for non-accomplishment -- while expending endless energy passing bills that have no chance of passing the Senate:

One quarter into the 112th Congress's two-year term, only 14 pieces of legislation originating in the House have become laws (12 bills and two house joint resolutions). Fourteen. Compare that with the House in the 111th, which claimed 254 laws (plus 11 house joint resolutions) over two years. The 110th had 308 (plus 10 house joint resolutions). Even the often-derided do-nothing 109th Congress's House controlled by the GOP passed 316 (with 16 house joint resolutions).

If the current House continues with this trend it will have produced a mere 48 laws by the end of the chamber's full term.

Quick math: The last three Houses have by this time in their tenure produced an average of 76 laws each.

But when House Republicans are actually in session, it's not exactly like they're doing nothing. They've made a point of passing bills that "send a message." Over and over, they've brought legislation to the floor that was doomed to die in the Democrat-controlled Senate. Why? To put taxpayer money where Republican congresspersons' mouths (and votes) are. Yes, the House Republicans of 112th Congress are having a love affair with the symbolic vote.

Dupuy compiled a list of the many bills that have passed the House with no chance of passage in the Senate, including the health-care repealers, defunding Planned Parenthood and NPR, ending the oil-drilling moratorium in the Gulf, and gutting the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Of course, these are the same people demanding that President Obama devise a debt-ceiling plan ... even though that's a responsibility clearly in Congress' hands.

By the way, look for more of Dupuy's work here at Crooks and Liars. She's joining the C&L team beginning Monday. (You can also check out her work at her own site.) Welcome Tina!


Help run these ads to beat Republicans in Wisconsin recall

Your Ad Here
olsen-banner
olsen-banner
The main event in the Wisconsin recall elections take place in only 12 days, and Democrats have taken the lead. We need at least three wins on Aug. 9, and polling shows us not only crushing Republican Dan Kapanke, but also narrowly ahead of Republicans Randy Hopper and Luther Olsen.

So, it's really simple. If these leads hold, we win.

Here is our plan to make that happen. In the two districts where Democrats hold narrow leads, we are going to run Google Blast ads during the final 120 hours of the election.

Goal Thermometer
This means two things. First, every single person who goes online in those districts will see our ads an average of 20 times by Election Day. Second, we will drown out any online ads run by Republicans and their corporate masters, making it all but impossible for the GOP to fight back online.

We need $13,596 per district to run these ads. Please, contribute $7 to Daily Kos to make it happen.

Everything is in place. We're leading in the polls. We've reserved the ad time. We've produced the ads using the best poll-tested, user-suggested message that takes the class war right at Republicans. You can see examples of the ads at the top and top right of this post.

No matter what is taking place in Washington, D.C., in Wisconsin we are on the brink of proving that determined grassroots activists, when united with a fighting Democratic Party, can stop the forces of austerity in their tracks. Please, contribute $7 to Daily Kos to make that victory happen.

Update: We've raised enough money to run the ads in one of the districts, but we need to run them in both. Please, chip in $7.


Profiteering and Union-Busting Repackaged as School Reform

Your Ad Here

Teacher's Desk (photo: Pikaluk on Flickr)

This is one of those stories that shows how far some people will go in America to make a buck—even if it means profiting at the expense of children, or exploiting the legacy of the civil rights movement.

 

 

Stand for Children is an unassuming name for an organization. Just taken at face value, one would conclude that the Portland, Oregon-based nonprofit aspires to accomplish what the title suggests. Their website says SFC is “an innovative, grassroots child advocacy organization. Our mission is to use the power of grassroots action to help all children get the excellent public education and strong support they need to thrive. Our members believe we need to stand up for our children now – particularly for their education from pre-school through high school – to create a better future for America.”

Now, that all sounds good, until you dig deeper. The co-founder and CEO of SFC, Jonah Edelman, is the son of Marian Wright Edelman, the well-respected civil rights activist and head of the Children’s Defense Fund. Critics charge that Stand for Children started out on the right side of the issues, devoting itself to progressive issues such as class sizes, affordable children’s healthcare and adequate funding for schools. But then, things changed when they started taking the money, and lots of it— from wealthy interests who arguably care nothing about poor children of color in the inner cities, and care a great deal about a vision of privatization that extracts profit from the public schools.

In an infamous YouTube video that went viral, Edelman discussed his strategy in Illinois at a July 10 Aspen Institute event. That strategy was essentially to mislead the teachers unions, do a number on them, and pay off the state legislators to pass SB7, an extensive school reform bill. The original bill would have stripped teachers of their right to strike, eliminated seniority as a factor in layoffs, and denied teachers their due process rights that come with tenure. What this has to do with the interests of children is anybody’s guess. A weaker version of the bill that passed still undermined labor rights by restricting seniority and the right to strike.

Typically, when Edelman goes into a state, he sets up a PAC, raises a ton of money and hires the best lobbyists money can buy. He benefits from his mother’s Rolodex and the cache her name and reputation brings to the table. SFC spreads money around in the community, in an attempt to soften up the black clergy and community leaders and get them on board as partners. And they bribe public officials to pass union-busting legislation.

In Illinois, SFC raised $3 million late last year and hired 11 lobbyists. They approached Illinois Speaker Michael Madigan—who failed to garner union support that year for passing pension reform— and donated $610,000 to nine state campaigns in both major parties.

And Edelman attended a community meeting of black Chicago clergy with what observers have called a “slick dog and pony show.” But the pastors didn’t take the bait. According to Rev. Robin Hood, executive director of Clergy Committed to Community, SFC wasn’t the least bit interested in the concerns of the black community.

“One of the schools I’m working in has serious problems. Their organizer wasn’t concerned about that, they were interested in getting people to see [the film] Waiting for Superman,” Rev. Hood said of SFC. “Waiting for Superman did not fly here in Chicago. It wasn’t a hit like they thought it was going to be. It was about taking away the rights of unions to organize. In the communities we live in we need living wage jobs,” he said. “Most of these parents have been arguing about how we don’t have books in school. Those are not the things Stand for Children were talking about. They were talking about taking power from teachers,” Hood added.

From the start, Rev. Hood found Edelman and his group disrespectful and arrogant, with dollar signs and union-bashing on their mind. “I found they were anti-union when we met with Stand for Children. It was all about money, it was nothing about children. That’s why they had to build a grassroots component. They did a switch up while they were working here,” he said.

Although SFC spread around a lot of money in Chicago communities, Rev. Hood emphasized that not one of the pastors in his group would take any of it. “How much money do you people have?” he asked rhetorically of Edelman. “First they said they are doing political advocacy, and using community organizations as their base. Six months later they said ‘we got our own base now.’ Then they gave $3 million to state legislators,” he noted.

“Instead of advocating they became lobbyists,” Rev. Hood concluded.

Rev. Hood also shared his thoughts on the recent fallout from Edelman’s comments at Aspen. “As much money as they put out, I didn’t think they would self-destruct,” Hood said. “On a personal level, it was interesting to see him self-destruct, and I knew they weren’t focused on changing things for the children. They were union busting and making money off the backs of our kids.” Moreover, Rev. Hood believed Edelman’s public disclosure of his machinations with Speaker Madigan was particularly damaging. “Speaker Mike Madigan is the most powerful man in the state. The Governor doesn’t have that power. To say what he [Edelman] did to him [Madigan] is what the Japanese call hari-kari.”

To put Jonah Edelman and his operations in perspective, just follow the money. Susan Barrett quit her volunteer leadership position at SFC in Portland because wealthy investors are now driving the organization. “I want to make sure that people pay close attention to who is on the SFC board, where their money is coming from, and think critically about whether or not the agendas they are promoting will bring the results parents and community members hope for in public education,” Barrett recently wrote.

SFC’s Illinois PAC amassed the state’s largest war chest, just days before new caps on state campaign contributions went into effect. Those new restrictions limit individual contributions to $10,000, with $20,000 from corporations. All of the contributions to SFC were five- and six-figure amounts, including $250,000 from the billionaire Pritzker family, and $500,000 from Ken Griffin, CEO of the Citadel Group and bankroller of GOP state candidates. Sam Zell, owner of Tribune Co., contributed $100,000. Meanwhile, of the $610,000 that Edelman gave to legislative candidates, his PAC handed over $175,000—a record for Illinois— to Republican state House candidate Ryan Higgins, who lost his contest.

Stand for Children’s donor list is quite impressive, and equally revealing. For example, last year SFC received a $3.5 million grant from the Gates Foundation, its largest donor. The Walton Family Foundation—of Walmart anti-union fame—chipped in $1.4 million. And New Profit Inc., with ties to a firm running Muammar Gaddafi’s PR campaign, has donated nearly $1.5 million in recent years.

Meanwhile, the SFC board of directors consists of venture philanthropists and private equity investors, including the extremely wealthy and powerful. One would think that a “grassroots child advocacy organization” would have at least a token of community representation on its board, including educators and child advocates of color. Laurene Powell Jobs, wife of Apple CEO Steve Jobs, is a board member, as is Emma Bloomberg, daughter of New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

Mayor Bloomberg, who is pro-charter school and seems to claim personal ownership of New York’s public schools, has a history of placing ill-prepared corporate types in charge of the nation’s largest—and mostly black and brown— school system. Bloomberg’s most immediate past schools chancellor, a magazine executive named Cathleen Black, had no experience in education whatsoever. During her brief and painful stint as chancellor, Black offended many with her jaw-dropping remarks, which included addressing shortages in classroom space by asking “Could we just have some birth control for a while? It could really help us all out a lot.”

Black’s predecessor, Joel Klein, now Rupert Murdoch’s deputy at News Corp., is overseeing an investigation into the company’s infamous phone hacking scandal. Klein is the head of Murdoch’s new education technology business, which Murdoch plans to spend $1 billion to build.

But the larger picture here is that corporate education reform is big business. And the rightwing, plutocratic agenda— of school privatization, government austerity measures and deunionization— clashes with the needs of poor, working class, and disproportionately black and brown public school students.

“What I can say personally is their true colors came out. He won’t get a base in my community.” Rev. Hood said defiantly of Edelman. “We need to educate our kids, not get rich folks richer. These are the same people that don’t want you to have a living wage and adequate housing.”

Meanwhile, the education reformers, armed with a pocketful of billionaire money, rip off communities of color. And as they buy off legislatures, they come off looking like the saviors of the black and brown children they just pimped.

“I wish I could be wrong, but I think they’ll be back for vouchers,” Rev. Hood offered on a cautionary note. “They’ll be back with a sad sack of legislators to write a bill for vouchers.”

Sen. Pat Roberts writes his own Roberts/Obama fan fiction

Your Ad Here
Hoop Dreams
This is the creepiest thing I've heard a senator go on about in some time. And let's face it, it's hard to get creeped out by senators these days: it's a high bar. A damn high bar.
Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kansas) on Tuesday described in detail an imaginary basketball game he would play with President Obama in which he would explain why he thinks it’s unfair to single out the aviation industry for tax hikes.

“Perhaps he could actually invite me," Roberts said on the Senate floor. "[E]verybody knows the president is a very good basketball player."

Roberts, who said he also plays basketball, then laid out lengthy narrative of how the game that might ensue.

Now mind you, by lengthy, we mean 20 minutes. Twenty long, detailed, imaginary-sweat-filled minutes describing a fantasy one-on-one basketball game with the president of the United States, one in which Roberts would simultaneously talk shop about corporate aircraft depreciation schedules:

“He would probably go to the left corner and sink a three about that time, and I would want to emphasize…that he…seems to be fixated on one specific industry,” said Roberts, adding he would say Obama has "singled out the general aviation industry as an example of big business that serves only the wealthy.”

“And then after I shot and missed it and I would say ‘your ball again, Mr. President,’ I would say as he was trying to drive around me rather successfully, ‘the truth is that these aircraft actually serve as an essential business tool…’” continued Roberts.

Roberts story carried on in a similar colloquial style for about 20-minutes and included several elements of basketball including dribbling, Obama stealing the ball, the president “spot [ting] him 10,” a free shot, a hook shot, and the senior senator from Kansas giving the president a “sort of nudge” when he got under the bucket and the president throwing a “sharp elbow” that resulted in a foul.

I ... I don't know what to say to this. I have to say I've never thought to Google "Pat Roberts Barack Obama fan fiction," and I'm not about to now, but now I know that if I ever do, the most prominent entry will be from Pat Roberts himself.

How would you ... I mean, of all the things to ... I mean, that does sound like the sort of pill-induced dream that a tired senator might have, after a long night of fundraising, but I can't imagine coming up with a 20-minute narration of such a thing on purpose.


The president drove toward the basket, and our shoulders briefly touched. His shirt was warm and moist, and my heart raced. "You know, private aircraft enhance productivity for the job creating class," I said, attempting to match his brisk pace and graceful moves.


And here's what I don't get: it's not like these senators can't get ample time with the president. On the contrary, all we hear about is Republicans refusing to meet with him.


Nearing the hoop, he jumped into the air. It was graceful, like a Gulfstream G650 with optional four-place conference table. "Why, a recent study shows that ..." He dunked, effortlessly, and I was lost in the moment. "All right, that's 12 points to 10," he said, beaming.

"A study shows that merely reupholstering the seats on a Cessna Citation X on a bi-yearly basis can employ up to 25 people, so—"

The president put his finger to his lips. "Don't speak," he whispered. "Just play."


I mean, let's say Roberts does meet with Obama in the near future. What do you say to the president of the United States after you've just gone on at great length, in public, about your imaginary basketball game with him? And even worse, that you were such a business geek that you spent the whole time in your own self-created fantasy world explaining your views on private air travel to him? What a terrible date—I mean, what a boring subject!

Sen. Roberts may be strange, and he may be able to go on for 20 freaking minutes with self-made fantasies involving sweaty conversations between himself and the president, which I am pretty sure really ought to get you on some Secret Service list of possible stalker threats (either the list labeled "do not let these people anywhere near the president" or "check these people for sharp objects whenever they visit"), but in fairness, Roberts did imagine that he lost his own basketball game, in the end. So he's got humility, I think we have to give him that much.


The ball soared into the air: it was my last opportunity. It hit the rim, but too far, I knew, to the right: it bounced off, flying well out of bounds and into the driveway, where a Secret Service agent hurried to fetch it before it rolled into a nearby rosebush. I had lost the game.

But I knew that America's private aviation industry had won Obama's heart.